← all facts
social
You judge people by their actions but yourself by your intentions.
Although Jones and Nisbett (1971) proposed that people attribute their own actions to situational factors while attributing others' to dispositional factors, subsequent research, including a 2006 meta-analysis, suggests this asymmetry is not as consistent or widespread as once thought.
The claim overstates the consistency of the actor-observer asymmetry as an established psychological law.
You are the protagonist of your own story, but a background character in everyone else's.
Where this comes from
- Study
- Jones and Nisbett, 1971, Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior
- What the check found
- While Jones and Nisbett proposed the theory in 1971, later meta-analyses show the effect is not consistently observed as a universal human tendency.
- Confidence
- Solid, with limits
Related
One of these every day, and every one names the study it came from. When a finding is contested, it says so.