← all facts
social
You judge people by their actions but yourself by intentions.
The hypothesis of a foundational actor-observer asymmetry in attribution, while influential in early social psychology, has been largely refuted by meta-analytic evidence.
Empirical testing has failed to consistently demonstrate the actor-observer asymmetry across the contexts where it was expected to appear.
You judge everyone else by their output, but yourself by your struggle.
Where this comes from
- Study
- Jones & Nisbett, 1971, Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior
- What the check found
- While Jones and Nisbett proposed the hypothesis, subsequent meta-analyses failed to find evidence that this asymmetry is a universal or foundational feature of social cognition.
- Confidence
- Solid, with limits
Related
One of these every day, and every one names the study it came from. When a finding is contested, it says so.